UK time is: 22:12:19
Vital Login
Social Login

Choose your club

Other Sites

Network Navigation

Vital Partners

'If It's Football, It's Vital'

Rangers In Their Rightful Place

Queens Park Rangers have been determined as being in their overall correct position by a recent study.

The 'Achievers Report` performed by the new football pools takes into account the following factors:

The club`s 'starting position` in 1992

Stadium capacity and average attendances 1992-2008

Changes in club ownership and associated investments

Financial difficulties, including administration

Transfers in and out since 1992

League and Cup performances each season


Quite how accurate this study is however is open to debate as they describe QPR as the following:

"Having finished the first three Premier League seasons in the top ten, to now be a struggling Championship side smacks of a significant under-achievement

"The reality is that QPR of the early 1990s were undoubtedly over-achieving and the QPR of today is probably a more realistic assessment of the club`s size and capabilities.

"Financial problems have beset the clubs since the start of the millennium, and the recent merry go rounds in the boardroom and the managers office have to be taken into consideration when you assess the club`s overall performance. But despite having three billionaire backers we think the Rangers fans who now believe anything but the Premier League is under-achieving need a reality check."


We want to know YOUR thoughts!

To have your say you can comment in the space provided below, or chat about it on the forum.

TOP STORIES

Cole - I Never Gestured.

Man of the Match - Radek Cerny.

Power Struggle At Rangers.


Image Hosted by ImageShack.us





Click here to join in the debate on the club forum.

The journalist

Writer: Boxer Mail feedback, articles or suggestions

Date:Thursday October 23 2008

Time: 9:27PM

Your Comments (oldest first)

Change to most recent first
Interesting in some respects, but since 1992 the study holds very little validity in my opinion
Boxer
Report Abuse
23/10/2008 21:31:00

 

Have Your Say

Log in...
with your social network     OR     with your Vital account

Recent Queens Park Rangers Articles

Who R Ya - Stoke City (Wednesday January 28 2015)

The Men in Black - Stoke City v QPR (Wednesday January 28 2015)

Mutch Palace Bound? (Wednesday January 28 2015)

Redknapp Refutes Brazilian Rumours (Friday January 23 2015)

Another Young Loanee Returns (Friday January 23 2015)

Palace Game Moved (Wednesday January 21 2015)

Leading The Race or Non-Starter? (Wednesday January 21 2015)

Mbia Wants Premier League Return (Tuesday January 20 2015)

Green Voted MotM v Manchester United (Tuesday January 20 2015)

Archived Queens Park Rangers Articles

List All Vital QPR Articles
Have your say
Click here to suggest an article
Click here to suggest a poll

Vital Members League (view all)

League Results (view all)

Latest Results
Q.P.R. 0 - 2 Man Utd
Burnley 2 - 1 Q.P.R.
Q.P.R. 1 - 1 Swansea
Q.P.R. 0 - 0 Crystal Palace
Arsenal 2 - 1 Q.P.R.
Q.P.R. 3 - 2 WBA

League Table (view table)

Team P W D L GD Pts
14. WBA 22 5 7 10 -9 22
15. Aston Villa 22 5 7 10 -14 22
16. Sunderland 22 3 11 8 -14 20
17. Burnley 22 4 8 10 -15 20
18. Hull City 22 4 7 11 -10 19
19. Q.P.R. 22 5 4 13 -16 19
20. Leicester City 22 4 5 13 -14 17

Breaking League News

Who R Ya - Stoke City
Q.P.R. : 28/01/2015 19:27:00
The Men in Black - Stoke City v QPR
Q.P.R. : 28/01/2015 19:06:00
Mutch Palace Bound?
Q.P.R. : 28/01/2015 18:47:00
Hamburg Confirm Newcastle Striker Interest
Newcastle : 28/01/2015 18:15:00
Roberts Signs First Pro Deal
Newcastle : 28/01/2015 18:08:00

Current Site Poll (view all polls)

Do you agree with Harry Redknapp that a new STRIKER is a priority?
Suggested By:  Admin
Yes - We need another striker 55%
No - We need a goalkeeper 6%
No - We need a defender 33%
No - We need a midfielder 6%